Here's what I got out of tonight's debate: Romney heard through the grapevine whilst enjoying that foreign trip he's writing off as a business expense that women needed flexible hours. His "nice guy" gesture was to free them from their job shackles so they could get home to their children to cook dinner. Wow.
The other social ill that was landed on women's lap was that "two-parent families" were the only way to raise socially responsible children.
Questions: Does the definition of "two-parent" families include gay marriage? Does this mean that the family in San Jose consisting of two lesbians who adopted three mentally challenged/deaf children is without merit?
What about husbands who beat their wives and/or kids? Is it better for women stay in an abusive situation because it is more socially acceptable in Mormon eyes? In actuality, I think it's because Mitt does not want to see single women coming begging for equal rights and opportunity. Keep them barefoot and pregnant.....
No comments:
Post a Comment